Download Higher Resolution PDF
Kelly_MatthewArizona Attorney Matthew J Kelly – Jail records and jail intake photo for Extreme DUI – Maricopa County
As of the date of this Complaint, Defendant(s), Kevin McCoy, owe(s) Plaintiff the sum of $10,549.71(on one or more credit card accounts) plus 10% Arizona Statutory interest after Judgment pursuant to A.R.S. § 44—1201
kevin_mccoy_citibank_lawsuit_default_credit_card
Download PDF
SEIDBERG LAW OFFICES, P.C.
P.O. Box 7290
Phoenix, Arizona 85011
(602) 248—8117
Kenneth W. Seidberg, SBA #3690
Joseph L. Whipple, SBA #21391
Attorneys for Plaintiff
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA AND FOR THE COUNTY OF MARICOPA
CITIBANK SOUTH DAKOTA, N.A.,
CV2004—012363
C O M P L A I N T
Plaintiff, VS.
KEVIN MCCOY and (Credit Card Account(s))
JANE DOE, Spouse
Defendants.
Plaintiff, CITIBANK SOUTH DAKOTA, N.A., alleges as follows:
1. Plaintiff, CITIBANK SOUTH DAKOTA, N.A., is national banking association based in South Dakota and the subject debt arises out of credit card transactions that occurred in the above captioned County/Precinct/State and/or the Defendant(s) reside(s) in said County/Precinct and State;
2. As of the date of this Complaint, Defendant(s) owe(s) Plaintiff the sum of $10,549.71(on one or more credit card accounts) plus 10% Arizona Statutory interest after Judgment pursuant to A.R 8 § 44—1201, and Plaintiff has applied any payments/credits previously received (see attached exhibits);
3. Plaintiff has made all demands and taken all actions necessary to nature and/or accelerate the obligation and Defendant(s) has(have) failed and refused to pay the amount alleged to be due and owing;
4. To the extent the Defendant(s) was (were) married during the times that purchases were made, Plaintiff alleges the debt to be both community and separate in nature. If the debt is solely a pre—marital one, the nondebtor Spouse is joined only as a necessary party pursuant to Arizona Law.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for Judgment against Defend— ant(s), both separately and as a community, if applicable, and each of them, for the amount stated above, plus interest, costs and such other relief as the Court deems just and proper.
DATED this 24—Jun—04.
SEIDBERG LAW OFFICES, P.C.
Joseph L. Whipple, SBA #21391
Citibank (South Dakota), NA.
Plaintiff, Vs AFFIDAVIT
Kevin McCoy
Defendant,
STATE OF MISSOURI )
COUNTY OF PLATFE
)
who is of lawful age, after first being duly sworn, deposes and says as follows:
Personally known to me. subscribed and sworn to before me, a notary pub’
Citicorp Credit Services, Inc. (USA), referred to as “CCSl/USA” herein, and the Plaintiff Citibank (South Dakota), NA. are both wholly owned subsidiaries of Citigroup, Inc. By contract, CCSl/USA has agreed to collect debt owed to Citibank (South Dakota), MA. on its credit card accounts.
By virtue of the described contract relationship and my employment, all information contained in and/or about delinquent Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. credit card accounts are made available to me for the purpose of collecting such delinquent debt, I have personal knowledge of all relevant financial and account information concerning Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. account number 5424180526703217 . which is made the subject of this lawsuit, including: the name and address of the debtor, the history of all charges representing loans, finance charges, fees imposed; payments made and credits received: the outstanding balance due; that Defendant did apply for and was issued that credit card account by Citibank (South Dakota). N.A.; that Defendant did thereafter use or authorize the use of the credit card account for the purpose of obtaining loans to purchase goods and services or cash advances; that Defendant has been provided monthly statements required by the Federal Truth in Lending Act describing the amount due; that Defendant did fail to make timely payments on the credit card account according to the terms of the card agreement and as requested on monthly statements of account; and that Defendant is presently in default of those terms By virtue of such default the entire balance of $10,549.71 on the account is presently due and owing.
Demand for payment of the balance owing was made more that thirty (30) days prior to making this affidavit, after which the attorneys representing Citibank (South Dakota). NA. were retained for the purpose of collecting the delinquent debt owed on the credit card account referenced above.
Exhibit A attached hereto is a hard copy print out of the financial information, including the balance owing, residing on the Citibank (South Dakota), NAA. computer system as of the date the account(s) was (were) referred for collection to the attorney maintaining this lawsuit. The balance owing on the date of referral has remained unchanged from and after that date,
The debt reflected on Exhibit A is delinquent, past due and remains due and owing. Plaintiff is the party and entity to whom the delinquent debt is owed. There are no set-offs, credits, or allowances due or to become due from the Plaintiff to the Defendant, other than those set forth herein or set forth on Exhibit A attached hereto.
Defendant has made no claim of being an active member in the military services of the United States or any state thereof. and to the best of my knowledge, the defendant is not an active member in military service. Nor has Defendant requested reduction of the interest rate on the account to six percent (6%) pursuant to the Soldiers and Sailors Civil Relief Act.
Affidavit
Attorney Management Specialist Title
r the state of Missouri, this A 5 day of Jun 04
CRYSTAL L. ALDRIDGE ;
Notary Public — Notary Seal AZ.3929.18
(SEAL) My Commission Expires:
State of Missouri Clinton County My Commission Expires February 18, 2005
‘ 06/21/04 510549.71. 59999.99 06/04/04 CITI CARDS P.0. BOX 6418 KEVIN MCCOY THE LAKES. NV ATTKV ACCOUNT-CODE=LB41 83901-6418 PMOENIX AZ 85029-2312000 A.
Citi” Dividend Platinum Select“ Card Cl ‘
AWN-fiber 5424 1805 2670 3217
Cusiomer 50m 1am cmm Line Available Cndh Llnl cash nuance LII-nit Molt-II: cm. Llnm new uni-nee
—800-925- 8871
1 514200 $0 53900 so 310549.71
a” “0° Statement] Amount 0m Puma/Any Mlnlmum
THE LAKES . IIV ciuin am “In Lin. Pm Du. Inlnulm Duo Amount iw-
09163-6000 05/26/2 04 0.00 31613.05 224.00 310549.71 SIB Dull Post Dd. Rullrllto lumblr Lemmy Slut! List Mint!“ Annunl
Please note mat payments must be received by 1:00 p.m.. local time, an a pank husmess day at the pa men; processing facfligy that handles your aymen 5. “I order to be credi ed to your account as uf that day, and Qayments must conform to
the payment instructions set forlh on the reverse side. All confqrmm; paymeMs received git the_ Eavmenl’ rocessmq facnity after that time will e crcdi ed as of the following hank buso9css
day.
Hel is available! Please call the tall-frce null or shown above m learn about pur special ayment o lions. Call uondav – Friday. 7 am to pin, nr‘ alums , 6 am 105 pm. Central Time. Please qwe us t e opportunity to assist you.
firm/mus 2+ Bureaus“ H Baymenf: {+5 METRE! 3:) pr Accu‘m Mm“ Balance 8- Advances 8. Credits CHARGE Balance PURCHASES $10.549.7l 0.00 0.00 0.00 510,549.71 ADVANCES $0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $0.00 TOTAL 510,549.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 510,549.71 Dix: This Bllllns Perlon: 29 Ba uric: 5:) no a Penn 1: Naming ANNUAL Rm 5mm” Finance Char e Rate APR PERCENT GE TE PURCHkSES Standard Purch $0.00 0.07668’M0) 27.9905 27.9905 Purcn/Adv thru 08/27/2003 50.00 D.07668%(0) 27.9901: {7.990% ADVANCES Standard Adv $0 .00 0.07668MD) 27 . 990% 27 . 990%
SITEzKC-CL TM:C0’5000 ACIlJzKCBTlSD
18:58:52:
I l
JACOB MARTINEZ Accounl 5491 1303 N80 3792 Nari! 8 – May1u,2m4
|n the return envelope. please:
1 Endoscyonrchusmr money order. lndude your account number and name on the from of your draw or money order.
Please, no cash or foreign currency.
2 Encloscynurpaymemmupm. Do not staple or tape it to your
payment. Insert the payment coupon so that the entire AT&T Universal Card address appears through the windaw of your remittance envelope.
Page 2 013 m1
‘ “’ SEIDBERG LAW OFFICES. P.C.
JOSEPH L. WHIPPLE. 5559
STATE Bar # 21391
2412 E. CAMPBELL AVE., SUITE 200
PHOENIX, AZ 85016 U 212 (602)248-3117
ATTORNEY FOR THE PLAINTIFF ‘
SEIDBERG LAW OFFICES. P.C.
ATTORNEY FOR THE PLAINTIFF ‘
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FILED DE}, MARICOPA COUNTY, STATE OF ARIZONA
CITIBANK SOUTH DAKOTA, N.A., N0. CVZOO4—012363
ATTEMPTED SERVICE BY PRIVATE PERSON
PLAINTIFF vs
KEVIN MCCOY AND JANE DOE, SPOUSE ASSIGNED TO THE HONORABLE
JUDGE:
DEFENDANT
STATE OF ARIZONA ) 55. County of Maricopa )
The undersigned. being first duly sworn, states: 1. That I am fully qualified. pursuant to RCP 4(d). to serve process in this cause:
2. That on 06/28/2004 I received the following documents:
a) SUMMONS 8 COMPLAINT b) CERTIFICATE 0N COMPULSORY ARBITRATION c)
Track Down, Inc. CTTent ID NO….: 4-1830 PO Box 56846 Field Report No_: 4062376 (v2.12)
Phoenix, AZ 85079-6846 (602) 252-8521
U
3. That the person served does not have any military obligations, except as noted below.
4. That if this is an affidavit of posting of a trustee’s sale, a due and diligent effort to ascertain whether or not trustors are affiliated with the military service was done, and no one could be found at the posting location who had knowledge of the trustors except as noted below.
5. That I personally served copies of the above documents, on the person at the time, piace and manner as follows:
ATTEMPTED SERVICE UPON KEVIN MCCOY, AT 3219 WEST CHARTER OAK ROAD, PHOENIX, ARIZONA, 35029. SERVICE HAS ATTEMPTED HERE ON 6/29 AT 8:05 A.M., 7/3 AT 7:50 A.M., 7/A AT 5:10 P.M., 7/5 AT 8:25 P.M. AND ON 7/7 AT 5:20 A.M.
THE DEFENDANT IS AVOIDING. DURING THESE ATTEMPTS I COULD HEAR ACTIVITY INSIDE THE RESIDENCE BUT NO ONE WOULD OPEN THE DOOR. PER THE MARICOPA COUNTY ASSESSOR’S OFFICE AND PER THE COLE’S DIRECTORY THE DEFENDANT RESIDES HERE. I SUGGEST ALTERNATIVE SERVICE IN ACCORDANCE WITH RCP 4.1(m), BE CONSIDERED.
0 Document(s) I certify under penalty of perjury that served: 3 0.00 the foregoing is true and correct.
0 U/G(s) Executed on: served: 0.00 Monday the 12th Day of Ju1y, 2004
O SaTes Notices
posted: 0.00 16 Miies: 38.40 7% Min. Miies Tota’l 0.00 _________ _ : _______________________ -_
Document Prep. Fee 8.00 Leonard P. LoBreglio
Witness Fee 0.00 Registered in Maricopa Fiiing Fee 0.00 Additional Cost 0.00 0.00 Track Down, Inc. 0.00 PO Box 56846 Phoenix, AZ 85079-6846 TOTAL 3 46.40 (602) 252-8521
4062376 (v2.12)
mum in JEAEEE. ELEM»
VED €010 SEIDBERG LAW OFFICES, P.C. “€332ng {Isms-HORY P.O. Box 7290 ‘ _ 0 Phoenix, Arizona 85011 mqu -h PH 2-0 (602) 248—8117 ‘ . BLED Kenneth W. Seidberg, SBA #3690 BY3HOPKDm DE?
Joseph L. Whipple, SBA #21391 Attorneys for Plaintiff
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF MARICOPA
CITIBANK SOUTH DAKOTA NA, ‘ CAUSE NO: CV2004-012363
Plaintiff, MOTION TO ALLOW SERVICE UNDER ARIZONA RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 4.1(M)
AND ORDER
VS
KEVIN MCCOY and JANE DOE, Spouse
Defendant(s).
COMES NOW the undersigned attorney for Plaintiff and respectfully moves this Court for its order allowing service of the Summons and Complaint in the above entitled matter upon Defendant(s), KEVIN MCCOY and JANE DOE, Spouse by posting the summons and complaint on the doorstep of the residence located at the address set forth below, and by mailing a copy of same to the Defendant(s) at the same address. The basis for this is more fully set forth in the attached Memorandum of Points and Authorities. Debtors‘ Address:
3219 W Charter Oak Rd Phoenix Arizona 85029—2312
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this Q day of , 2093/
SEIDBERG LAW OFFICES, P.C.
Josep L. Whipple, SBA #21391 Attorney for Plaintiff
Kimberly Celaya vs City of Goodyear, Arizona Federal Court
Matthew Kelly vs. Melanie Kelly-Brit – Maricopa Family Court
MICHAELK. JEANES Clerk of the Superior Court By sheila panicki, Denny
Date 10/20/2014 Time 14:64:17
Matthew J. Kelly Descriptim 811381111: 1126 W. Elliot Road, #2032 –——– CRSEll 17132014095670 Chandler, AZ 85224 11H) 11 (480)221-0083 mum WI}in 601 338.00 mkelly@kelly—mccoy.com W» ——
181911. min $56.00
Razeiptli 24096045
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA
IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF MARICOPA FC2014-095670
In re the Marriage of:
MATTHEW J. KELLY,
No.
PETITION FOR DISSOLUTION OF NON-COVENANT MARRIAGE
and (With Children) MELANIE M. KELLY,
Petitioner,
Respondent.
Petitioner Matthew J. Kelly, for his Petition for Dissolution of Non-Covenant Marriage, alleges as follows:
1. Petitioner, Matthew J. Kelly (“Petitioner”), was born on October 21, 1974 (age 39), his Social Security Number is listed on the Family Court Sensitive Data Coversheet included with this Petition, and his occupation is attorney. Petitioner’s address is 1126 W. Elliot Road, #2032, Chandler, AZ 85224, and he has been domiciled in Arizona for more than 90 days.
2. Respondent, Melanie M. Kelly (“Respondent”), was born on July 1, 1973
(age 41), her Social Security Number is listed on the Family Court Sensitive Data
Coversheet included with this Petition, and her occupation is physician assistant.I)
N
\DOONQU’I-b
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
‘18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Respondent’s address is 1633 W. Manor Street, Chandler, AZ 85224, and she has been domiciled in Arizona for more than 90 days.
3. The parties were married on June 8, 1996, in Flagstaff, Coconino County, Arizona and since that time have been and are now husband and wife. —-
4. This marriage is not a covenant marriage.
5. The parties’ marriage is irretrievably broken and there is no reasonable prospect of reconciliation. The conciliation provisions of A.R.S. § 25-38109 either do not apply or have been met. Petitioner has complied with, or prior to finalizing this case, will comply with the domestic relations education provisions of A.R.S. § 35—3 52.
6. The parties have three children in common: Lucas Matthew Kelly, age 12; Owen Rivers Kelly, age 9; and Tate Skinner Kelly, age 6. The children’s residential address, Social Security Number and date of birth are not listed to maintain confidentiality and privacy, but instead are listed on the Family Court Sensitive Data Coversheet filed simultaneously herewith.
7. Petitioner has not participated as a party or witness or in any other capacity in any other proceeding concerning the custody of or visitation with any child listed herein.
8. Petitioner does not know of any proceeding that could affect the current proceeding, including proceedings for enforcement and proceedings relating to domestic violence, protective orders, termination of parental rights and adoptions.
9. Petitioner does not know of any person who is not named as a party in this proceeding that has physical custody of, or claims rights of legal custody or physical custody of, or visitation with any child subject of this action.
10. Wife is not currently pregnant.
11. Neither party has committed an act of domestic violence against the other party.
12. This Court currently has jurisdiction to determine custody of the minor
children common to the parties because the minor children have lived with Petitioner or 21 Respondent in Arizona for at least the last six months or other factors exist that confer jurisdiction upon Arizona in accordance with A.R.S. § 25—1031(A).
13. Upon information and belief, the parties have reached the following
hWN
agreements on custody, parenting time, child support and spousal maintenance: Child Custody: The parties shall have joint custody. Parenting Time: The parties shall have essentially equal parenting time. Child Support: Except in the event of a substantial and continuous change in
circumstances, no party shall have a child support obligation to the other party.
\OOO‘QOM
Spousal Maintenance: Neither party shall be entitled to spousal maintenance.
10 WHEREFORE, based upon the foregoing, Petitioner respectfully requests that the 11 Court:
12 A. Order that the marriage between the parties be dissolved, and the parties 13 restored to the status of single persons.
14 B. Award both parties the joint legal custody of the parties’ minor children in 15 accordance with the agreements of the parties set forth in a written parenting plan to be 16 submitted to the Court and such other provisions determined by the Court to be in the best 17 interests of the children.
18 C. Award essentially equal parenting time in accordance with the written 19 parenting plan to be submitted with the final Decree or Judgment, or alternatively in the 20 best interests of the children. I
21 D. Order that, except in the event of a substantial and continuous change in
22 circumstances, neither party be awarded child support.
23 E. Order that neither party be awarded spousal maintenance.
24 F. Order the equitable division of the parties’ assets and liabilities;
25 G. Confirm the parties’ respective sole and separate assets;
26 H. Order that each party pay all debts incurred by him or her, respectively,
27 from the date this Petition is served;
28 I. Order each party to pay their own attorneys’ fees and costs; and 310 ll 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
J. Order such other and further relief as this Court deems appropriate.
DATED: October 20, 2014.
STATE OF ARIZONA
County of Maricopa
Petitioner Matthew J. Kelly, being first duly sworn upon oath, states that he is the Petitioner in the above-entitled matter; that he has read the foregoing Petition and that the
)
) ss.
)
Q
Matthew J. Kelly Petitioner
same is true, correct and complete to the best of his knowledge and belief.
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this 20th day of October 2014, by
Matthew J. Kelly.
My Commission Expires:
LlL/Hp {15/
f mam-mum
Q,
Matthew J. Kelly
(wt
Notary Public
0m SEN. LISA PIJSKO
MARICOPA COUNTY m Comm. mm 16. 2015