The scheduling issues in this case clearly are the result of (Kelly’s) lack of familiarity with the mechanics of the new scheduling rules and the virtual gutting of Rule 38.1, Ariz. R. Civ. P.

For example, had Plaintiff timely propounded discovery on May 29, 2015, as permitted by the scheduling order, the responses would not have even been due until July 13, 2015, leaving a little more than two weeks to satisfy Rules 26(g) and 37(a)(2)(C), Ariz. R. Civ. P., then file a motion to compel if efforts to …

Matthew Kelly completes alcohol screening to avoid an Arizona Sate Bar complaint

Thomas and Rebecca Walcott Arizona Federal Bankruptcy The Walcott Law Firm

Thomas and Rebecca Walcott 95 E. Mary Lane Gilbert, AZ 85295 The Walcott Law Firm 2487 S Gilbert Rd Ste 106-495 Gilbert, AZ 85295-2832 Maricopa County 602.689.0283 Fax: 480.917.1247 Tiffany & Bosco 2525 E. Camelback Rd., 7 Floor Phoenix, AZ 85016 Phone: 602.255.6000 Fax: 602.255.0103 Kevin McCoy Matthew Kelly Kelly-McCoy PLC Download Higher Resolution PDF