Posts

Posted on

Ronald Sell vs Sandee Sell Maricopa Family Court

ronald_sell_vs_sandee_sell_maricopa

K. JEfifiES

‘:.L he Super’mr {hurt

sxnesmmsflmssw;

Law offices of _. fl , – I …. + s A amt

1811 5. Alma School Road, Suite 225 BESE’rELpiL an ‘89:“ “—.—_’— 1′ L”. 4‘ E Mesa, Arizona 85210 L’ “4} ““ ’unu

DIVERSE fig SHELB £02 081 i£§.efi Salmig駥¥§fiY ISTAL éfifififii iéfieflc

(480) 345-8404 State Bar #005525 Attorneys for

Petitioner

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA

IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF HARICOPA

In re the marriage of ) – -‘ ) DR2000-092975 RONALD J. SELL, ) no, ) Petitioner. ) PETITION FOR DISSOLUTION ) OF MARRIAGE and ) ) SANDER BERRY SELL, ) ) Respondent; )

)

_______________—————-————

COMES NOW the Petitioner, RONALD J. SELL, by and through his undersigned counsel, and for his Petition for Dissolution of Marriage herein states and alleges as follows:

I That Petitioner’s name is RONALD J. SELL; he is presently forty-three (43) years of age, being born on July 30, 1956; he is presently employed as a physician; he has been domiciled within the State of Arizona for more than ninety (90) days prior to the commencement of this action.

Petitioner’s residence address is 4280 West Dublin Street,

Chandler, Arizona 85226.John R. Zarzynski 1811 5. Alma School Road, Suite 225 Mesa. Arizona 85210 (480) 345-8404

II Respondent’s name is SANDEE BERRY SELL; she is presently fifty (50) years of age, being born on December 16, 1949; she is employed as a census worker/craft maker and she has been domiciled within the State of Arizona for more than

ninety (90) days prior to the filing of the Petition for

Dissolution of Marriage herein. Respondent’s residence

address is 4280 West Dublin Street, Chandler, Arizona 85226. III The parties were married on or about June 19, 1999 in Mesa, Arizona. IV That the marriage of the parties is irretrievably

broken and that there is no reasonable prospect of

reconciliation. The conciliation provisions of A.R.S. 525—

381.09 either do not apply or have been met.

V

There are no minor children common to the parties of the marriage and Petitioner/Wife is not now pregnant. VI The parties entered into a written Prenuptial Agreement, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A. Said Prenuptial Agreement meets the general qualifications of

A.R.S. 525-201 et. seq. and defines the rights andAlma School Road, Suite 225 (480) 345-8404

John R. Zarzynski Mesa, Arizona 85210

S.

responsibilities of the parties in the event of a dissolution

of marriage.

VII That during coverture, to the extent that the parties have acquired certain joint, common or community property and incurred certain debts and obligations, this

Court should divide them equitably. VIII

Neither party is entitled to an award of spousal

maintenance.

WHEREFORE, the Petitioner/Husband requests the

following relief:

1. That the Court enter a Decree of Dissolution of Marriage and restore each of the parties to the status of

single persons.

2. That neither party be ordered to pay spousal

maintenance.

3. That the separate property of the parties as

defined by law and pursuant to their Prenuptial Agreement be

confirmed to each of them.

4. That to the extent that the parties have acquired joint, common or community property and obligations,

that said property and obligations should be divided equitably

between them.John R. Zarzynski 1811 S. Alma School Road, Suite 225

Mesa, Arizona 85210 (480) 345-8404

5. For such other and further relief as the Court

deems just and proper under the circumstances.

DATED this 1t) day of

LAW OFFICES OF JOHN R.

, 2000.

ZARZYNSKI

Joh R. Zarzy Attorney for PetitionerJohn R. Zarzynski

1811 5. Alma School Road,

Suite 225

Mesa, Arizona 85210 (480) 345-8404

EEBLELQéElQE

STATE OF ARIZONA ) ) ss. )

County of Haricopa

RONALD J. SELL, being first duly sworn, upon his

oath deposes and says:

1. That he is the Petitioner in the above matter;

2. That he has read the foregoing Petition for

Dissolution of Marriage and knows the contents thereof,

and

that the matters and things stated therein are true to t e

best of his knowledge, information and belief.

SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me, the undersigned

Notary Public, this SC) day of §x>§3 54 , 2000.

My Commission Expires:

Q gld‘y 36 M30}

xx; 55 3 :3me got/Wu;

‘ Notary Public -~nn..;I-M’nuu»vu I .

o ain’uv’brnI-v‘hu-u‘v—vah—w”r-v-r w: – v “—1….

«Wu .MMN..~..~.._.M_. .1 u u hw..1.—’U ~

~.—……. “fin-mu.

. um».— n-u’w-aO-h u

H …v……….. .,. y . an.

“mun” «u g.

4!! my“ {qua/cf if e.‘77~<r ,«dei’a/ljahflylw if Jomf umé afl/rin) 77w Mafia. liq?“ 1” 7“ 2w! Slur-1 Para/)1 4/ far/KI, ‘ 4w [Again 734* Cmud’ (a NJ“! 1’7 [Malia (44/! L4 474.214 4), 1,114.3 “Liam 1,7 ,. Mia/If «Mr/.z/c 4,1..‘7lm/4q 6.11/6ng ml . #104,212 wil/ L «(€9.41 fag aflw Artfvimflr is {bfaal

L!- in 31 ¢J¢Q7L 0″ flak/Offe. 9L9“! 4;)?715

I

awn/I, LAW 72am”. in 72.4 emxfir gag/A? arm-er My Jar-«w we «we «Irv/13a,» 2w m

I

5’. Zack fanly LVIH Paul: 44 wiw/a,‘~\ 4a “Await 4: 32.}

ya”. 154 fivluvflé gro?{f/‘/ firm/’lwgf Mrru‘4j(_- fl” (5)3:ng (Lac (v!‘\ 52+ A47,” A‘ht‘g )4, harass “7;! h ’1‘)”, rtffiyjj . MEJWQ) 223i 4.4″.” A ia’émfic… 7″” 5494* ‘1 [9.079.

w ‘ w. »

gag/“14 74» mar fm‘fl

.44. Zn.._,7’~\ “ff 45vo’is, ‘5‘.”059/ 4v?” .4: r7uw4/

v. u we m 2% W tux-M ,4,

AM¥M5 asJfiwf own”. ’4‘} 2‘47L fl“ IMF/55¢: Wail/1t TC’ 145714 MR /0‘2, 57‘ 7L4 4fpm3-4 Mae. (M, Ma k, 4 gm 94,471. warm M7224 We ML of 5&1?” Arcgpnf cféa’fuc 7/1/77 [744]“; of ;ww->’l-.‘P. JL, 72“ eva/ If 1.9m, fink all A.“ “W; 7!, )1 “a 7e“ Am ’70,“,‘9 (:15 yanknm A“ A.“ «:AL/sw) 43¢ A m” A.“ ,3“;

Posted on

Susan Sell vs Ronald Sell – Maricopa County Family Court

susan_sell_vs_ronald_sell_maricopa

Maria P; Stein. Esq. State No. 009568 STEIN and STEIN, P.C.

1 2826 south Carriage Lane VSuite 100

1 Mesa, Arizona_ 85202 (602) 820-1421

Attorneys for Petitioner

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE 8131. O? AIIIOIR IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF HRIICDRB In Re the marriage of: SUSAN H. SELL, Petitioner, *and

PETITION FOR DISSOLUTHN‘ OF MARRIAGE

(with Children)

RONALD J. SELL,

Respondent.

vwvwvvvvvvvv

R

Petitioner. SUSAN H. SELL, by and through her counsel, Maria 9. Stein of 3mm and swam, P.C. , hereby alleges as f llows:

1. Petitioner is, 39- years ‘of £93. her ‘ ~-

address is 2494 NOrth El Dorado Circle, Chandler, Agizaugs“

Petitioner is a homemaker. > i _ > 23”».Respondent is 38 Years of age ané his Illiyh, address is 2494 Nbrth El Dorado.Circ1e, Chandler; Arizona 87 Respondent’s occupation is a physician. 7‘ ~f3r . The parties hereto Here harried on or aboute¥> .11, ‘1979-7inv Greenville, Pennsylvania, and ever since that ‘

been and are now husband and uifegtr’v4. Respondent is not pregnant. 5. Respondent is not in the military service ‘ United States of America.

~ Themarriag‘ebetween the-pan“ <~ r v

i : broken and there is no reasonable prolpcct for

conciliation provisions of 33.8. 15481.09 It lug. Oi ‘ apply or have been met.‘

7. .-Petitioner and lie-pendent have boon ’ Maricopa County,r~Arizona,, for more than ninety (90) d!!! ‘ the filing of this Petition.

8. The parties [have four minor childron m the :,parties} namely: RYAN’P. SELL, born June 4. 1986, ‘ born June 4, 1986,‘ ADAM’SELL, born November 15. 1997 and SELL, born September 4, 1990. I V

I The Court has jurisdiction I has ”

‘ decide child custody matters because the minor

domiciled in Arizona and Arizona is ’11:!» state“ children. _ L V ‘ 1C2 Petitioner should be awarded sole custody

minor children; Respondent should have reasonable 1 the children pursuant to: visitation v’ ‘Maricopa County Domestic Relations I; 11. ‘ Respondent, should pay cayreasonabile amount child support consistentwith Child, I n _.and..A.R..s..5259320,.W.melamunt of shim support should be {as each, child turns (V18),years of age, and if

Vi- reaches the age: of majority the child is attendinéschool, child.- suppert should continue to be ,meperiod,which the child is actually.attand1ng high schoolr .A;

. < Assignment for such amount should inane. _

, Rewmt..’h6u1d, m .. I tr dental insurance for the minor children and aha-11¢! I ELPercent, (1.040%) of all medical and dental W i‘children. ‘ ‘ 1

a ‘m

q

,13.‘ ‘The parties should file joint federal income tax returns for the year of 1994 and equallyvinflthereceipt of any refunds p

1‘ obligation owed.

a _» : v 1.4…Petitioner is without I aufficient fund. support and. is temporarily unable to obtain I V’fRespondent is in control of the bulk of the ecnlunity earning sufficient sums of money from euployuent and sufficient suns of money from investments and should be

a pay a reasonable sum as and for spousal uaintenanoet;

. V . :15. v Respondent should maintain Petitioner irrevocable-beneficiary on a life insurance policy i life in sumsflenfficient to cover any remaining at: rmimzenanee and child support for so long as V

2i and child support are owed. ‘ i

_ , I. x 16.: Petitioner shouldrbe awarded the mid-act

12494 7-31,: Dorado Circle, Chamiler, Arizona 3-52ng

-?§ ~:’ ..»a~~11m¢¢Duringlflutmarr1398,«flutpartieslunNhacquireQT ‘J’Ointpcomon; and community property all of axial: equitably divide; During the marriage, theincurred: joint ,‘ common, and comunity liabilities should equitably divide. ‘ i 18. Petitioner has certain property the marriage and/b: “du’fifi”g'” thaterrfiée. “as ’a” f, _ inheritance, which should be affirmed as her ‘mlof and

property .

19-” ‘1‘“? Personal property. including m

accounts, which were acquired or established for the ciao: of the parties, should remain the property. of _

9 children– arid- should notfbe comingled with ath at

parties. y ‘ ‘ 7 ~20. . Petitioner is without sufficient financier/l to» pay for beret-attorney’s fees (other than. initial.

‘fee) and court1costs ,., accountant’s fees and appraisal Respondent”. should be. ordered to e reasoxiablc contribution to these costs .7 V

21,. The parties have not entered into an oral WHEREFORE. Petitioner prays that- this Court will ‘7 the following Orders: ‘5 L in “1., 1 Entera Decree of Dissolution of ‘ 2.: waardin’gzto the Petitioner sole custody of ”

children ‘ of thiammarriage subject to Petitioner?s iv 7

visitationi-rights-pursuant to the visitation guidel’ihes is

the’Maricopa _- County Don‘testic Relations Handbook; Requiring,.Respondent and for; child“suPPOI-it.consistent with the Axizoua”5Child ‘

Guidelines and ‘A’.R~.S.~_§25-320. A Wage Assignmentflfor such:~

4should issue.

4. Requiring Respondent to pay for and

and dental insurance for the minor children and that , , “‘s‘hOUTd”paY*One Hundred Percent (moir’af ‘ Vdental expenses for the minor children.

5. Ordering the parties to file joint federal and income tax returns_for the year of 199‘ and they Ibflfili”“§ ,equally in the ..-receipt i of any refund. and the

«one ave-a. 3’»- u to

obligation owed.

‘3’. we

w-fi. v Requiring Respondent to pay a reasonable sun as fifié

H H

for spousal maintenance.

H r to

7. Requiring Respondent to maintain Petitioner ijiflfi

‘H V“:

irrevocable beneficiary on a life insurance policy on

H 1‘

~1ife in sums sufficient to cover remaining suns owed an

~01‘

.maintenance and child support for so long as spousal an n J

a . c:

and child support are owed.

8. Ordering the payment of connunity debts and £33

it ~a

equitable division of community property of the parties as Ode

forth herein cove.

‘8 :3″;

9. Ordering *that‘yRespondentr be ordered to p:y~»

N a

,reasonahle amount as contribution to the costs of Petitioner1 rattorneyis fees (other than her initial retainer fee). and coat:

rcosts, accountant’s fees and appraisal fees.

3 a a: :53 rib: ism. r , P d m t 8 an

83

V lSTATE 01″. A3120“ ,.

I e ), as?” _ )

‘ County of Maricopa I,;. ’SUSANH’. SELL, Petitioner in the foregoing glha-ve read the foregoing r-Petition for Dissolution of Herring. ml kntwthev matters set: forth therein to be true to bolt (l _khew1edge,-ex¢ept those matters alleged upon information “V V I “7: ,Ia’ncri, as to such matters, they are believed ta be

4 DATED this m day of February, 1995. ‘

SUBSCRIBED AND ‘SWORN to-before- this of

” ‘_ February, 1995 .

Commissi n Expires: ‘ ‘ ‘ .v fll’ozwdasaexdxsuommam

an a: t t at

Posted on

Ronald Sell vs. Cynthia Beakly Injunction Prohibiting Harassment – Maricopa

ronald_sell_cynthia_beakly_injuction_harassment

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA COUNTY OF Maricopa STATE OF ARIZONA

Defendant

EIRNING THIS IS AN OFFICIAL COURT ORDER. IF YOU DISOBEY THIS ORDER, THE COURT MAY FIND YOU IN CONTEMPT OF COURT. YOU MAY ALSO BE ARRESTED AND PROSECUTED FOR THE CRIME OF INTERFERING WITH JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS AND ANY OTHER CRIME YOU MAY HAVE COMMITTED IN DISOBEYING THIS ORDER.

NOTE: THIS INJUNCTION IS EFFECTIVE ON THE DEFENDANT ON SERVICE OF A COPY OF TEE INJUNCTION UPON THE DEFENDANT AND THE INJUNCTION EXPIRES, UNLESS RENEWED, SIX MONTHS AFTER SERVICE ON THE DEFENDANT. YOU ARE ENTITLED TO A HEARING IF YOU FILE A WRITTEN REQUEST FOR HEARING WITH THE COURT. A- HEARING WILL BE HELD WITHIN TEN DAYS FROM THE DATE REQUESTED UNLESS THE COURT FINDS COMPELLING REASONS TO CONTINUE TEE HEARING.

E/The Court has reviewed:

‘ D/ The Plaintiff’s petition D Other pleadings D/ Other evidence offered by the Plaintiff ‘ Upon finding that there is reasonable evidence of harassment of the Plaintiff by the‘Defendant and that good cause exists to believe great or irreparable harm would result to the Plaintiff if the injunction is not granted before-the Defendant or his attorneypan be heard in opposition, After hearing and the Court-finding good cause,

IT IS ORDERED pursuant to A.R.S. § 12—1809:

D/ TH 1,. the Defendant shall nt: , . If, I f I 111/ ’ yuan: ‘{u .41 .11.; I amt a: ’1 KL: 4-1 I .. zlégfli ‘ v ” ’

WHITE-Court CANARY-Defendant PINK-Plaintiff GOLDENROD-Retum of Service to Court

3899-14121 R533 ‘ Page 1 dz(t y c. d

\”

B/THAT the Defendant stay away from the following locations or persons (addresses provided):

[j Plaintiffs home: 303/ élzc £29m: fl pt 3’72/ @Mg/g 4??”

E/Plaintiff’s place of employment: 55”. 39’? g ‘7’ W £W/X 522.

, / , , [2/ Other locati (s: .1471: I “he” ” ,1 III ” ’-’ ” “A 1…;

D GRANTING Other Relief:

Date ‘ //92″97

DBSCRIPTIOH OP barman

Efi-fi

3899-141 :2 R533 Page 2 of 2